Pseudoscience is a system of explanation that is presented as science. But it lacks the rigor essential to the scientific method. It is based on faulty premises, flawed experimental design, or bad data. Doesn’t stand up under scientific scrutiny. It is purported to be backed by science or data. It can also be a complex system, such asked astrology which is affected by astronomical phenomena. Pseudoscience is harmless.
Pseudoscience is a theory, methodology, or practice that is considered to be without a scientific foundation. It’s a psychological thing. This science is based on science. Any field theory resuming without a warrant to have a scientific basis for the application is called pseudoscience.
Climate dinners are accused of practicing Pseudoscience. It is also called intelligent design creationist astrologers, UFOlogist, parapsychologists, and often anyone who strays far from the scientific mainstream. There is a definition between science and pseudoscience. And it is not a wrestler fraught with definitional disagreements because the categories are too broad. It’s a subject to adjective and abuse against any claim one happens to dislike for any reason. It is Much fuzzier and more permeable than proper would have us believe. This science is identified by Karl Popper. He called it the demolition problem of finding a criterion to distinguish between empirical science.
It’s a general theory of relativity that is successful in 1999. This theory might have been falsified and son the slight deflection of starlight bent by the sun’s gravitational field. It is known to all that Many sciences are non-falsifiable. Here is some non-falsifiable theory such as string theory, neuroscience theory, Grand economic models theory, and hypothesis. No one in the history of the world has ever self-identified as a pseudoscience. Its proponents are doing bad science. They are not doing science at all. I called it creationism.